Overall this is a limited and underdeveloped essay which is clearly in the level 2 descriptor, but at the upper end. As such when, ideas, facts, and skills are applied it is more likely for them to be useful. Knowledge questions are not explicitly stated but the clarity of the response indicates that there is a sustained focus on the answers to knowledge questions. The exception is the title that has the name of a book, story, poem, company, music composition, or film. In this case perspectives may have been a more useful term.
Since these valuable findings will be shared using language to help impact our lives. In the case of an academic or scientific paper, you should think about the people you would like to thank. Ultimately the candidate has given the reader some excellent examples but has not succeeded in fully unpacking the knowledge questions — too much work is left to the reader. The work, besides being descriptive regarding certain characteristics of abstract art, lacks focus and shows little coherence. This essay displays minimal characteristics of a level 2 performance; therefore, it deserved 3 instead of 4. For instance, if you've nailed the process of writing labs, do a science investigation. The argument on passive experiment which follows this is almost wholly incomprehensible.
Looking at natural science and mathematics with the filter of reason, sense perception, imagination, memory and language, this premise will be examined; and the question of the extent to which the value of knowledge can be determined will also be addressed. The introduction clearly explains the significance of the topic and why it is worthy of investigation. Why not kill two birds with one stone and head off to university with a scholarship? Through memory and sense perception, Edison picked up on this previous knowledge where he could then see the flaws of the previous attempts and by using reason analyzed and found ways to successfully experiment to build his own light bulb. This means that even though the theories are important and have real value especially in the development of theoretical physics, sometimes we are limited by the current inability of application. Definitely wish you were my economics teacher! Identify knowledge issues that you can accurately describe and support. What should an extended essay conclusion contain? Make sure that you have strong evidence to support your answer.
The student definitely acknowledges the implications drawn in each of the examples. The knowledge questions are not explicitly stated but the insightful nature of the essay demonstrates that there has been a consistent focus on the answers to knowledge questions. My students in Barcelona love it too and it makes my job easier. There is a limited understanding of the areas of knowledge chosen by this candidate and it does not succeed in developing any different perspectives — it is a one track essay. It is such a great help to have word counts of different sections and a detailed description on how to score high marks. Essay B—Level 3 6 marks This essay examines ways of knowing as entities that are both responsible for, and guardians against, doubt.
Check the official Extended Essay guidelines for more on this - it offers sample essay titles along with title choosing advice and essay titles to avoid for each subject area. Essay I—Level 3 5 marks The introduction to the essay is relevant but not well focused. The work on the natural sciences is at the top end of level 2 bordering level 3, whereas the work on the human sciences is at the bottom end of level 2 bordering level one. The candidate then claims to consider the scientific method through the example of Fazey and Hardy and then through the planet Pluto no longer being classed as a planet. It is also designed to allow readers to understand quickly the contents of the extended essay.
More importantly, you need to define complex terms that the reader may encounter to make it easier for them to understand your work. The light bulb is considered one of the most influential inventions in the world. They are easy to follow and digest. The following table could help you get started To what extent was. Once a writer has these, they formulate a blueprint that they can use to ensure that the writer effectively organizes all the major points they want to deliver.
Head to your school library and shop around for interesting books, encyclopedias, categories, etc. I just wanted to thank you for being a lifesaver. Are , , , , , , , and equally reliable justifications? Overall this is a basic and descriptive essay which only seems to occasionally reference the title. The essay is focused on some interesting, thoughtful and original examples and the candidate manages to analyse these examples from a ToK perspective. If a candidate reads an essay, they are very likely to fail.
Woods, your initiative is highly appreciated and needless to say, the resources on this website are helping thousands of students tremendously. The main body of the essay starts with a consideration of faith which is rather descriptive and the brief example provided of cheating on a test is trivial. At the point where the candidate addresses the role of imagination in both history and the natural sciences there is an improvement, but the overall level is critical analysis remains limited. The essay now moves on to mathematics which is problematic as the title requires the writer to address only two areas of knowledge. In my physics class, I learned how Stephen Hawking used reason to prove the theory of the existence of black holes and again using memory and reason to disprove it years later.
Thank you once again, sir! Create an account of your evidence Theory of knowledge essays encompass a lot of evidence and data. Follow these steps: Build an extended essay outline around the research question. Essay L—Level 4 7 marks This is a thoughtful and well-organised essay. Out of the entire prompt offered by the instructor, a student has to highlight the main point and make a research question to answer throughout the paper. However, these links, besides being superficial, are not directly connected to the prescribed title. It is very important that you keep your mind clear throughout the entire research and writing process because you will absolutely need to think clearly. There is clearly evidence of analysis in this section and the candidate succeeds in linking it back to the title.
The candidate focuses on the difficulties of avoiding doubt in history and the human sciences as a result of our inability to access directly the past and future, and the human mind, respectively. What would you do differently, in your planning, next time you do research like this? Immediately after, there is a section that deals specifically wit the propaganda film industry in Nazi Germany, how it used different kinds of film propaganda to indoctrinate the public with the different elements of Nazi ideology, and how widespread dissemination was achieved with such a technically complex medium. A paper of this type consists of more sections than most of the essays. After doing all your research 4,000 words is nothing your first draft could be 6,000-8,000 words. Unlike the bibliography, these people should not necessarily be authors of the sources where you gather information. That's 500 words in total, for all of the 3 reflections. You need it to obtain a degree in your target field of study.